Skip to content Skip to navigation

Article: Re‐evaluation of the ontogeny and reproductive biology of the Triassic fish Saurichthys (Actinopterygii, Saurichthyidae)

Palaeontology Cover Image - Volume 61 Part 4
Publication: Palaeontology
Volume: 61
Part: 4
Publication Date: July 2018
Page(s): 559 574
Author(s): Erin E. Maxwell, Thodoris Argyriou, Rudolf Stockar, and Heinz Furrer
Addition Information

How to Cite

MAXWELL, E.E., ARGYRIOU, T., STOCKAR, R., FURRER, H. 2018. Re‐evaluation of the ontogeny and reproductive biology of the Triassic fish Saurichthys (Actinopterygii, Saurichthyidae) . Palaeontology, 61, 4, 559-574. DOI: 10.1111/pala.12355

Author Information

  • Erin E. Maxwell - Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart Rosenstein 1 70191 Stuttgart Germany
  • Thodoris Argyriou - Paläontologisches Institut und Museum Universität Zürich Karl‐Schmid Strasse 4 8006 Zurich Switzerland
  • Rudolf Stockar - Museo Cantonale di Storia Naturale Viale Carlo Cattaneo 4 6900 Lugano Switzerland
  • Heinz Furrer - Paläontologisches Institut und Museum Universität Zürich Karl‐Schmid Strasse 4 8006 Zurich Switzerland

Publication History

  • Issue published online: 12 June 2018
  • Manuscript Accepted: 05 January 2018
  • Manuscript Received: 07 September 2017

Funded By

Cantone Ticino
Swiss Federal Office for the Environment
Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF). Grant Numbers: CRSII3‐136293, 144462

Online Version Hosted By

Wiley Online Library
Get Article: Wiley Online Library [Pay-to-View Access] |

Abstract

Viviparity has evolved independently at least 12 times in ray‐finned fishes. However, the fossil record of actinopterygian viviparity is poor, with only two documented occurrences. Both of these are from the non‐teleost actinopterygian Saurichthys, and include S. curionii and S. macrocephalus from the Middle Triassic Meride Limestone (Monte San Giorgio, Switzerland). Here, we present new data on the reproductive biology of these species, giving unprecedented insights into their life‐history. Based on positional and preservational criteria, six specimens were identified as unambiguously gravid. Embryos were positioned dorsal to the gastrointestinal tract, parallel to the axial skeleton and to each other, in the posterior two‐thirds of the abdominal region. A minimum of 16 embryos are preserved in the most fecund females and, based on the largest preserved embryos and smallest preserved neonates, birth must have occurred at 7–12% of maternal fork length. Embryonic crania and teeth are relatively well‐ossified, however ossification of the parietal region is delayed. In the postcranium, the median scale rows and lepidotrichia are ossified, but not the lateral scale rows. Ossified squamation and gradual allometric growth suggests that neonates did not undergo metamorphosis and were relatively precocial. When considered in a phylogenetic context, neither live birth nor internal fertilization appears to represent the primitive state for saurichthyid fishes.

PalAss Go! URL: http://go.palass.org/k58 | Twitter: Share on Twitter | Facebook: Share on Facebook | Google+: Share on Google+