Charge contrast imaging of exceptionally-preserved fossils

52 4 July 673 680 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2009.00886.x

KEARNS, S. L., ORR, P. J. 2009. Charge contrast imaging of exceptionally-preserved fossils. Palaeontology, 52, 4, 673–680.

Stuart L. Kearns and Patrick J. Orr Charge contrast images are a variant of secondary electron images acquired by operating a variable pressure scanning electron microscope in low vacuum mode; i.e. a gas is present in the specimen chamber. Spatial variation in the amount of charge that accumulates on the surface of the specimen is expressed as differences in greyscale tone; areas that are charging less are darker in tone. The precise mechanisms by which charge contrast images are generated are not known fully. Various different properties of a mineral may create a charge contrast; electrical conductivity is known to be one potentially important variable. As carbon is highly conductive but typical host lithologies (carbonates, silicates) less so or dielectric, the technique is potentially very suitable for imaging organically preserved fossils such as those from the Solite and Jehol biotas. It can also be applied to Burgess Shale fossils: complex films comprising 'aluminosilicates' with or without carbonaceous remains. Charge contrast images reveal anatomical detail not visible using either optical or other scanning electron microscope-based imaging methods.
  • ALLISON, P. A. 1988. Phosphatized soft-bodied squids from the Jurassic Oxford Clay. Lethaia, 21, 403–410.
  • ALLISON, P. A. and BRIGGS, D. E. G. 1991. The taphonomy of soft-bodied animals. 120–140. In DONOVAN, S. K. (ed.). The processes of fossilization. Belhaven Press, London, 303 pp.
  • BENTON, M. J., ZHOU, Z., ORR, P. J., ZHANG, F. and KEARNS, S. L. 2008. The remarkable fossils from the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota of China and how they have changed our knowledge. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 119, 209–228.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 1990. Organic preservation of non-mineralizing organisms and the taphonomy of the Burgess Shale. Paleobiology, 16, 272–286.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J. 2002. Perimineralization vs. compression: disparate modes of exceptional preservation in the Burgess Shale and their palaeobiological significance. 241–246. In DERENZI, M., PARDO ALONSO, M. V., BELINCHÓN, M., PEÑALVER, E., MONTOYA, P. and MÁRQUEZ-ALIAGA, A. (eds). Current topics on taphonomy and fossilization. Ajuntament de Valencia, Valencia, 544 pp.
  • BUTTERFIELD, N. J., BALTHASAR, U. and WILSON, L. A. 2007. Fossil diagenesis in the Burgess Shale. Palaeontology, 50, 537–543.
  • CAZAUX, J. 1999. Some considerations on the secondary electron emission, δ, from electron irradiated insulators. Journal of Applied Physics, 85, 1137–1147.
  • CUTHBERT, S. J. and BUCKMAN, J. O. 2005. Charge contrast imaging of fine-scale microstructure and compositional variation in garnet using the environmental scanning electron microscope. American Mineralogist, 90, 701–707.
  • DANILATOS, G. D. 1991. Review and outline of environmental SEM at present. Journal of Microscopy, 162, 391–402.
  • DOEHNE, E. 1998. Charge contrast: some ESEM observations of a new/old phenomena. Microscopy and Microanalysis 1997, 4 (Suppl. 2), 292–293.
  • FARLEY, A. N. and SHAH, J. S. 1990. Primary considerations for image enhancement in high pressure scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Microscopy, 158, 389–401.
  • FARLEY, A. N. and SHAH, J. S. 1991. High-pressure scanning electron microscopy of insulating materials: a new approach. Journal of Microscopy, 164, 107–126.
  • FINNIE, P., KAMINSKA, K., HOMMA, Y., AUSTING, D. G. and LEFEBVRE, J. 2008. Charge contrast imaging of suspended nanotubes by scanning electron microscopy. Nanotechnology, 19, 335202 (6 pp). doi: DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/33/335202.
  • GOLDSTEIN, J. I., NEWBURY, D. E., ECHLIN, P., JOY, D. C., ROMIG, A. D. Jr, LYMAN, C. E., FIORI, C. and LIFSHIN, E. 1992. Scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis: a text for biologists, material scientists, and geologists, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, New York, 818 pp.
  • GRIFFIN, B. J. 1997. A new mechanism for the imaging of crystal structure in non conductive materials: an application of charge-induced contrast in the environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM). Microscopy and Microanalysis, 3 (Suppl. S2), 1197–1198.
  • GRIFFIN, B. J. 1998. Electrons, ions and cathodoluminescence in the environmental SEM. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 4 (Suppl. S2), 290–291.
  • GRIFFIN, B. J. 2007. Variable pressure and environmental scanning electron microscopy: imaging of biological samples. 467–495. In KUO, J. (ed.). Electron microscopy. Methods and protocols. Humana Press, Iotowa, NJ, 608 pp.
  • KOSHIKAWA, T. and SHIMIZU, R. 1974. A Monte Carlo calculation of low-energy secondary electron emission from metals. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 7, 1303–1315.
  • MONCRIEFF, D. A., BARKER, P. R. and ROBINSON, V. N. E. 1979. Electron scattering by gas in the scanning electron microscope. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 12, 481–488.
  • NEWBURY, D. E. 2004. Assessing charging effects on spectral quality for X-ray microanalysis in low voltage and variable pressure/environmental scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 10, 739–744.
  • ORR, P. J., BRIGGS, D. E. G. and KEARNS, S. L. 1998. Cambrian Burgess Shale animals replicated in clay minerals. Science, 281, 1173–1175.
  • ORR, P. J., KEARNS, S. L. and BRIGGS, D. E. G. 2002. Backscattered electron imaging of fossils exceptionally preserved as organic compressions. Palaios, 17, 110–117.
  • ORR, P. J., KEARNS, S. L. and BRIGGS, D. E. G. 2009. Elemental mapping of exceptionally preserved ‘carbonaceous compression’ fossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 277, 1–8.
  • ROBERTSON, K., GAUVIN, R. and FINCH, J. 2004. Charge contrast imaging of gibbsite using the variable pressure SEM. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 10, 721–732.
  • ROBERTSON, K., GAUVIN, R. and FINCH, J. 2005. Application of charge contrast imaging in mineral characterization. Minerals Engineering, 18, 343–352.
  • STOKES, D. J., THIEL, B. L. and DONALD, A. M. 2000. Dynamic secondary electron contrast effects in liquid systems studied by environmental scanning electron microscopy. Scanning, 22, 357–365.
  • THIEL, B. L. and TOTH, M. 2005. Secondary electron contrast in low-vacuum/environmental scanning electron microscopy of dieletrics. Journal of Applied Physics, 97, 1–18.
  • THIEL, B. L., TOTH, M. and CRAVEN, J. P. 2004. Charging processes in low vacuum scanning electron microscopy. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 10, 711–720.
  • THIEL, B. L., BACHE, I. C., FLETCHER, A. L., MEREDITH, P. and DONALD, A. M. 1997. An improved model for gaseous amplification in the environmental SEM. Journal of Microscopy, 187, 143–157.
  • TOTH, M., THIEL, B. L. and DONALD, A. M. 2003. Interpretation of secondary electron images obtained using a low vacuum SEM. Ultramicroscopy, 94, 71–87.
  • WATT, G. R., GRIFFIN, B. J. and KINNY, P. D. 2000. Charge contrast imaging of geological materials in the environmental scanning electron microscope. American Mineralogist, 85, 1784–1794.
  • ZHOU, Z., BARRETT, P. M. and HILTON, J. 2003. An exceptionally preserved lower cretaceous ecosystem. Nature, 421, 807–814.
Wiley Online Library