Ontogeny and microstructure of the enigmatic Cambrian tommotiid Sunnaginia Missarzhevsky, 1969

55 3 May 661 676 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01131.x

MURDOCK, D. J. E., DONOGHUE, P. C. J., BENGTSON, S., MARONE, F. 2012. Ontogeny and microstructure of the enigmatic Cambrian tommotiid Sunnaginia Missarzhevsky, 1969. Palaeontology, 55, 3, 661–676.

Duncan J. E. Murdock, Philip C. J. Donoghue, Stefan Bengtson and Federica Marone The tommotiids are a significant component of the earliest skeletal animal remains in the fossil record, occurring in large numbers in the Lower Cambrian. Sclerites of the tommotiid genus Sunnaginia have been implicated as integral to hypotheses regarding the evolution of the brachiopod body plan, with a morphology intermediate between the unspecialized sclerites of the tubular Eccentrotheca and the specialized sclerites of the tannuolinids. Abundant Sunnaginia ?imbricata sclerites, of a broad ontogenetic spectrum, were recovered from the Comley Limestone, Lower Cambrian (Stages 3–4), Shropshire, UK and compared to Sunnaginia imbricata from the Aldan River, Siberia (uppermost Tommotian). New microstructural data, collected using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy, reveal a unique microstructure for Sunnaginia ?imbricata sclerites among the tommotiids; interlamellar cavities spanned by a series of continuous pillars, giving a colonnaded appearance contrasting to that of S. imbricata. These data refute the inclusion of Eccentrotheca within the Sunnaginiidae and highlight the need for a revision of suprageneric classification of the tommotiids. Rather, structural similarities between Sunnaginia sclerites and those of the tannuolinids suggest a close affinity to this group. Recent phylogenetic hypotheses place the tannuolinids as stem-linguliform brachiopods, with Paterimitra plus the paterinid (and possibly rhynchonelliform) brachiopods as their sister group. Our new data therefore resolve Sunnaginia as close to the node defining crown-Brachiopoda. However, the characters supporting this phylogenetic scheme cannot be consistently applied to all taxa, nor do they define a series of nested clades. We therefore suggest that a more thorough phylogenetic analysis is required in the light of the data presented here and other recent descriptions.
  • BALTHASAR, U., SKOVSTED, C. B., HOLMER, L. E. and BROCK, G. A. 2009. Homologous skeletal secretion in tommotiids and brachiopods. Geology, 37, 1143–1146.
  • BENGTSON, P. 1988. Open nomenclature. Palaeontology, 31, 223–227.
  • BENGTSON, S. 2004. Early skeletal fossils. 67–77. In LIPPS, J. H. and WAGGOBER, B. M. (eds). Neoproterozoic–Cambrian biotical revolutions. The Paleontological Society Papers, Austin, TX, 130 pp.
  • BENGTSON, S., CONWAY MORRIS, S., COOPER, B. J., JELL, P. A. and RUNNEGAR, B. N. 1990. Early Cambrian fossils from South Australia. Association of Australasian Palaeontologists, Brisbane, 364 pp.
  • BRASIER, M. D. 1986. The succession of small shelly fossils (especially conoidal microfossils) from English Precambrian–Cambrian boundary beds. Geological Magazine, 123, 237–256.
  • CONWAY MORRIS, S. and CHEN, M. 1990. Tommotiids from the Lower Cambrian of South China. Journal of Paleontology, 64, 169–184.
  • DONOGHUE, P. C. J., BENGTSON, S., DONG, X. P., GOSTLING, N. J., HULDTGREN, T., CUNNINGHAM, J. A., YIN, C., YUE, Z., PENG, F. and STAMPANONI, M. 2006. Synchrotron X-ray tomographic microscopy of fossil embryos. Nature, 442, 680–683.
  • ESAKOVA, N. V. and ZHEGALLO, E. A. 1996. Biostratigrafia i fauna nizhniego kembria Mongolii. Sovmestnaya Rossiysko-Mongolskaya Paleontologicheskaya Ekspeditsiya, Trudy, 46, 1–214.
  • GRIGORIEVA, N. V. 1982. Incertae Sedis. 41–65. In VORONIN, I. Y. (ed.). The Precambrian/Cambrian boundary in the Geosynclinal areas (the reference section of Salany-Gol, MP). Transactions of the Joint Soviet–Mongolian Palaeontological Expedition, Moscow, Nauka Izdatelstvo, 150 pp.
  • HARVEY, T. H. P., WILLIAMS, M., CONDON, D. J., WILBY, P. R., SIVETER DAVID, J., RUSHTON, A. W. A., LENG, M. J. and GABBOTT, S. E. 2011. A refined chronology for the Cambrian succession of southern Britain. Journal of the Geological Society, 168, 705–716.
  • HINZ, I. 1987. The Lower Cambrian microfauna of Comley and Rushton, Shropshire, England. Palaeontographica Abteilung A Palaeozoologie-Stratigraphie, 198, 41–100.
  • HOLMER, L. E., SKOVSTED, C. B. and WILLIAMS, A. 2002. A stem group brachiopod from the Lower Cambrian: support for a Micrina (halkieriid) ancestry. Palaeontology, 45, 875–882.
  • HOLMER, L. E., POPOV, L. and STRENG, M. 2008. Organophosphatic stem group brachiopods: implications for the phylogeny of the subphylum Linguliformea. Fossils and Strata, 54, 3–11.
  • HOLMER, L. E., SKOVSTED, C. B., LARSSON, C., BROCK, G. A. and ZHANG, Z. 2011. First record of a bivalved larval shell in Early Cambrian tommotiids and its phylogenetic significance. Palaeontology, 54, 235–239.
  • JEPPSSON, L. and ANEHUS, R. 1995. A buffered formic acid technique for conodont extraction. Journal of Paleontology, 69, 790–794.
  • KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S. and MURDOCK, D. J. E. 2010. A new tannuolinid problematic from the Lower Cambrian of the Sukharikha River in northern Siberia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 55, 321–331.
  • LANDING, E. 1984. Skeleton of lapworthellids and the suprageneric classification of tommotiids (Early and Middle Cambrian phosphatic problematica). Journal of Paleontology, 58, 1380–1398.
  • LANDING, E. 1988. Lower Cambrian of eastern Massachusetts – stratigraphy and small shelly fossils. Journal of Paleontology, 62, 661–695.
  • LANDING, E. 1995. Upper Placentian-Branchian series of mainland Nova-Scotia (Middle-Upper Lower Cambrian) – faunas, paleoenvironments, and stratigraphic revision. Journal of Paleontology, 69, 475–495.
  • LANDING, E., NOWLAN, G. S. and FLETCHER, T. 1980. A microfauna associated with Early Cambrian trilobites of the Callavia Zone, northern Antigonish Highlands, Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 17, 400–418.
  • LAURIE, J. R. 1986. Phosphatic fauna of the Early Cambrian Todd river Dolomite, Amadeus Basin, Central Australia. Alcheringa, 10, 431–454.
  • LI, G. X. and XIAO, S. H. 2004. Tannuolina and Micrina (Tannuolinidae) from the Lower Cambrian of eastern Yunnan, South China, and their scleritome reconstruction. Journal of Paleontology, 78, 900–913.
  • ROZANOV, A. Y., MISSARZHEVSKY, V. V., VOLKOVA, N. A., VORONOVA, L. C., KRYLOV, I. N., KELLER, B. M., KOROLYUK, I. K., LENDZION, K., MICHNIAK, R., PYKHOVA, N. G. and SIDAROV, A. D. 1969. The Tommotian stage and the Cambrian lower boundary problem. (Translation 1981). Amerind Publishing Co., New Delhi, 359 pp.
  • RUNNEGAR, B. 1982. The Cambrian explosion – animals or fossils. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia, 29, 395–411.
  • SKOVSTED, C. B., BROCK, G. A., PATERSON, J. R., HOLMER, L. E. and BUDD, G. E. 2008. The scleritome of Eccentrotheca from the Lower Cambrian of South Australia: lophophorate affinities and implications for tommotiid phylogeny. Geology, 36, 171–174.
  • SKOVSTED, C. B., BALTHASAR, U., BROCK, G. A. and PATERSON, J. R. 2009a. The tommotiid Camenella reticulosa from the early Cambrian of South Australia: morphology, scleritome reconstruction, and phylogeny. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 54, 525–540.
  • SKOVSTED, C. B., HOLMER, L. E., LARSSON, C. M., HÖGSTRÖM, A. E. S., BROCK, G. A., TOPPER, T. P., BALTHASAR, U., STOLK, S. P. and PATERSON, J. R. 2009b. The scleritome of Paterimitra: an Early Cambrian stem group brachiopod from South Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 276, 1651–1656.
  • SKOVSTED, C. B., BROCK, G. A., TOPPER, T. P., PATERSON, J. R. and HOLMER, L. E. 2011. Scleritome construction, biofacies, biostratigraphy and systematics of the tommotiid Eccentrotheca helenia sp. nov. from the Early Cambrian of South Australia. Palaeontology, 54, 253–286.
  • STAMPANONI, M., GROSO, A., ISENEGGER, A., MIKULJAN, G., CHEN, Q., BERTRAND, A., HENEIN, S., BETEMPS, R., FROMMHERZ, U., BÔHLER, P., MEISTER, D., LANGE, M. and ABELA, R. 2006. Trends in synchrotron-based tomographic imaging: the SLS experience. Proceedings of SPIE, 6318, 63180M.
  • WILLIAMS, A. and HOLMER, L. E. 2002. Shell structure and inferred growth, functions and affinities of the sclerites of the problematic Micrina. Palaeontology, 45, 845–873.
Wiley Online Library