Eyes and vision in the coeval Furongian trilobites Sphaerophthalmus alatus (Boeck, 1938) and Ctenopyge (Mesoctenopyge) tumida Westergård, 1922, from Bornholm, Denmark

58 1 January 133 140 10.1111/pala.12128

SCHOENEMANN, B., CLARKSON, E.N.K. 2015. Eyes and vision in the coeval Furongian trilobites Sphaerophthalmus alatus (Boeck, 1938) and Ctenopyge (Mesoctenopyge) tumida Westergård, 1922, from Bornholm, Denmark. Palaeontology, 58, 1, 133-140.

Brigitte Schoenemann and Euan N. K. Clarkson
  • Brigitte Schoenemann - Department of Neurobiology/Animal Physiology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (email: b.schoenemann@uni-koeln.de)
  • Euan N. K. Clarkson - School of Geosciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK (email: euan.clarkson@ed.ac.uk)
  • Issue published online: 7 JAN 2015
  • Article first published online: 3 OCT 2014
  • Manuscript Accepted: 17 JUL 2014
  • Manuscript Received: 8 APR 2014
SYNTHESYS Foundation

The two olenid species Sphaerophthalmus alatus (Boeck, 1838) and Ctenopyge (Mesoctenopyge) tumida Westergård, 1922, occur together in the Ctenopyge tumida Zone (Zone 19) of the Furongian of Scandinavia. Material from Bornholm, Denmark, forms the basis of this study of the morphology and partial ontogeny of the eyes. The eyes of both species are directed laterally and have virtually panoramic vision, looking out sideways like those of a rabbit. The eye of S. alatus is comparatively smaller, with fewer lenses and a larger eye parameter; calculations show that this trilobite was adapted for dim light intensity, possibly suggesting a vagrant benthic habit. Ctenopyge (Mesoctenopyge) tumida, with a smaller eye parameter, was adapted for a higher light intensity, and this trilobite was most likely a pelagic swimmer. The two species, although preserved together, inhabited different levels in the water column.

  • Acenolaza, G. F., Tortello, M. F. and Rabano, I. 2001. The eyes of the early Tremadoc olenid trilobite Jujuyaspis keideli Kobayashi, 1936. Journal of Paleontology, 75, 346–350.
  • Angelin, P. 1854. Palaeontologia scandinavica. Samson & Wallin, Stockholm, 91 pp.
  • Boeck, C. 1838. Uebersicht der bisher in Norwegen gefundkenen Formen der Trilobiten-Familie. 138–145. In Keilhau, B. M. (ed.). Gaea norvegica, Vol. 1. Johann Dahl, Christiania, 148 pp.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K. 1966. Schizochroal eyes and vision in some Silurian acastid trilobites. Palaeontology, 9, 1–29.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K. 1973. Morphology and evolution of the eye in Upper Cambrian Olenidae (Trilobita). Palaeontology, 16, 735–765.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K. 1975. The evolution of the eye in trilobites. Fossils and Strata, 4, 7–31.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K. 1979. The visual system of trilobites. Palaeontology, 22, 1–22.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K. and Ahlberg, P. 2002. Ontogeny and morphology of a new, miniaturised and spiny olenid trilobite from the upper Cambrian of southern Sweden. Palaeontology, 45, 1–22.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K. and Taylor, C. M. 1995a. Ontogeny of the trilobite Olenus wahlenbergi Westergård 1922 from the Upper Cambrian Alum Shales of Andrarum, Skåne, Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 86, 13–34.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K. and Ahlgren, J. 1995b. The lost world of the olenid trilobites. Geology Today, 11, 147–154.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K., Ahlgren, J. and Ahlberg, P. 1997. Ontogeny of the trilobite Parabolina spinulosa (Wahlenberg, 1818) from the upper Cambrian Alum Shales of Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 88, 69–89.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K., Ahlgren, J. and Taylor, C. M. 2003. Structure, ontogeny, and moulting of the olenid trilobite Ctenopyge (Eoctenopyge) angusta Westergård 1922 from the upper Cambrian of Vstergötland, Sweden. Palaeontology, 47, 1–27.
  • Clarkson, E. N. K., Ahlgren, J. and Taylor, C. M. 2004. Structure, ontogeny, and functional morphology of some spiny Ctenopyge species from the upper Cambrian of Vstergötland, Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 94, 115–143.
  • Exner, S. 1891. Die Physiologie der facettirten Augen von Krebsen und Insekten. Fr. Deuticke, Leipzig & Vienna, 202 pp.
  • Fordyce, D. and Cronin, T. W. 1989. Comparison of fossilized schizochroal compound eyes of phacopid trilobites with eyes of modern marine crustaceans and other arthropods. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 9, 554–569.
  • Fordyce, D. and Cronin, T. W. 1993. Trilobite vision: a comparison of schizochroal and holochroal eyes with the compound eyes of modern arthropods. Paleobiology, 19, 288–303.
  • Henningsmoen, G. 1957. The trilobite family Olenidae with description of Norwegian material and remarks on the Olenid and Tremadocian Series. Skrifter Utgitt av Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi I Oslo. 1 Matematisk-Naturvidenskapelig Klasse, 1, 1–303.
  • Horridge, G. A. 1977. Insects which turn and look. Endeavour, 1, 7–17.
  • Land, M. F. 1981. Optics and vision in invertebrates. 471–592. In Autrum, H. (ed.). Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. 7 (6B), Springer, Berlin, 728 pp.
  • Land, M. F. and Nilsson, D.-E. 2002. Animal eyes. Oxford University Press, 221 pp.
  • Lindstrőm, G. 1901. Researches on the visual organs of the trilobites. Kongliga Svensk Vetenskaps Akademie Handlingar, 34, 1–85.
  • Månsson, K. 1998. Middle Ordovician olenid trilobites (Triarthrus Green and Porterfieldia Cooper) from Jamtland, Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 89, 47–62.
  • Månsson, K. and Clarkson, E. N. K. 2012. Ontogeny of the upper Cambrian (Furongian) olenid trilobite Protopeltura aciculata (Angelin, 1854) from Skåne and Vstergötland, Sweden. Palaeontology, 55, 887–901.
  • McCormick, T. and Fortey, R. A. 1998. Independent testing of a paleobiological hypothesis; the optical design of two Ordovician pelagic trilobites reveals their relative paleobathymetry. Paleobiology, 24, 235–253.
  • Öpik, A. A. 1967. The Mindyallan fauna of northwestern Queensland. Bureau of Mineral Resources Australian Geologists’ Geological and Geophysical Bulletin, 74, 1–404.
  • Poulsen, C. 1923. Bornholms Olenuslag og deres faunas. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse, 40, 1–85.
  • Schoenemann, B. and Clarkson, E. N. K. 2012. At first sight; functional analysis of lower Cambrian eye systems. Palaeontographica A, 296, 1–27.
  • Schoenemann, B. and Clarkson, E. N. K. 2013. Discovery of some 400 million year old sensory structures in the compound eyes of trilobites. Nature Scientific Reports, 3, 1429. doi:10.1038/srep01429.
  • Schoenemann, B., Clarkson, E. N. K., Ahlberg, P. and Alvarez, M. E. D. 2010. A tiny eye indicating a planktonic trilobite. Palaeontology, 53, 695–701.
  • Snyder, A. W. 1977. Acuity of compound eyes: physical limitations and design. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 116, 161–182.
  • Snyder, A. W. 1979. Physics of vision in compound eyes. 225–313. In Autrum, H. (ed.). Handbook of sensory physiology, Vol. 7 (6A). Springer, Berlin, 729 pp.
  • Snyder, A. W., Stavenga, D. G. and Laughlin, S. B. 1977. Spatial information capacity of compound eyes. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 116, 183–202.
  • Towe, K. 1973. Trilobite eyes: calcified lenses in vivo. Science, 179, 1007–1009.
  • Westergård, A. H. 1922. Sveriges olenidskiffer. Sveriges Geologiske Undersökning, Ca, 18, 1–205.
  • Westergård, A. H. 1944. Borrningar genom Skånes alunskiffer 1941–42. Sveriges Geologiske Undersökning, Ca, 459, 1–45.
  • Zhang, X.-G. and Clarkson, E. N. K. 1990. The eyes of Lower Cambrian eodiscid trilobites. Palaeontology, 33, 911–932.
  • Zhang, X.-G. and Clarkson, E. N. K. 2012. Phosphatised eodiscids from the Cambrian of China. Palaeontographica A, 297, 1–121.
Wiley Online Library (Free Access)