Do brachiopods show substrate‐related phenotypic variation? A case study from the Burgess Shale

60 2 March 269 279 10.1111/pala.12281

TOPPER, T.P., STROTZ, L.C., SKOVSTED, C.B., HOLMER, L.E. 2017. Do brachiopods show substrate‐related phenotypic variation? A case study from the Burgess Shale. Palaeontology, 60, 2, 269-279. DOI: 10.1111/pala.12281

Timothy P. Topper, Luke C. Strotz, Christian B. Skovsted, and Lars E. Holmer
  • Timothy P. Topper - Palaeoecosystems Group Department of Earth Sciences Durham University Durham UK (Email: timothy.topper@durham.ac.uk)
  • Luke C. Strotz - Biodiversity Institute & Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Kansas Lawrence KS USA (Email: lukestrotz@gmail.com)
  • Christian B. Skovsted - Department of Palaeobiology Swedish Museum of Natural History Stockholm Sweden (Email: christian.skovsted@nrm.se)
  • Lars E. Holmer - Department of Earth Sciences Palaeobiology Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden (Email: lars.holmer@pal.uu.se)
  • Issue published online: 22 February 2017
  • Manuscript Accepted: 18 January 2017
  • Manuscript Received: 18 November 2016
Swedish Research Council. Grant Numbers: VR 2009‐4395, 2012‐1658 COFUND Junior Research Fellowship

As sessile, benthic filter feeders, brachiopods share an intimate relationship with their chosen substrate. Individuals of Micromitra burgessensis in the Burgess Shale Formation are preserved in life position, attached to a range of hard substrates, including skeletal debris, conspecific brachiopods, sponges and enigmatic tubes. Here we investigate the phenotypic variability of Mburgessensis associated with differing substrate attachments. We apply geometric morphometrics to test for variation by plotting landmarks on the exterior of ventral and dorsal valves of Mburgessensis specimens that are preserved attached to different substrates. Using principal component, canonical variate analyses and anova, we determine that there is some variation in shape related to substrate. Canonical variate analyses, for ventral valves and dorsal valves, indicate that specimens attached to the same substrate are recognizable in shape from specimens attached to other substrate types. The strength of differentiation however, is not robust and combined with our discriminate analysis of separate populations suggests that there is the potential for substrates to exercise only weak control over the morphology of Brachiopoda.

Data for this study are available in the Dryad Digital Repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.320h5 Wiley Online Library